Google.org's Giving $20 Million to Engineer a Better World for
the Disabled
Damien Maloney for WIRED
Google's philanthropic arm, Google.org, has been making a big
global push this year to aid the one billion people around the
world living with disabilities. To further that goal, it's just
awarded $20 million to the 30 nonprofitsit believes could benefit
most from its tech and data-driven approach to charitable giving.
From open source electric wheelchairs to multi-lingual keyboards
you can control with eye-tracking technology, the chosen projects
focus on solutions for disabled people in five main categories:
education, communication, mobility, independence, and employment.
For Dot-org, as Googlers call it, this is a big moment.
Google.org has revealed some awardees and partial grant amounts
for its first-ever Global Impact Challenge in the past few
months. But today it's announced its full lineup, including 17
new nonprofits. Dot-org gave six of the 30 grantees more than $1
million to spend on advancing their causes. And the average
grant size promised to these nonprofits, Dot-org says, is
$750,000. According to the philanthropic organization, the final
roster of grantees reach over 50 countries with their projects.
"We want to use our global voice to try and spread these
innovations to more people," says Brigitte Hoyer Gosselink,
project lead for Google's global impact challenge. "We also have
scale in mind in funding these projects. We're really looking
for ways that these organizations can put this innovation out
into the universe."
The range of nonprofits reflects the breadth of Google.org's
ambitions: One of the grantees is the Center for Discovery, which
is developing an open source power add-on that converts any
manual wheelchair into a powered one that gives people more
automatic steering options and better mobility. Another pick is
the Perkins School for the Blind, which is working on tech that
goes beyond GPS to give people with visual impairments more
visibility into their immediate surroundings-helping them pick
out bus stops, for instance, or building entrances. Dot-org also
chose Click2Speak, a nonprofit that's developing an on-screen,
multi-lingual keyboard that includes support for input devices
such as switches, joysticks, or eye-tracking devices, aimed at
users with impaired motor skills.
Of course, Dot-org's announcement isn't the first, or even the
biggest, pledge in the history of tech philanthropy. (That
distinction goes to Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan, who
pledged 99 percent of their Facebook fortune-$45 billion-to
philanthropic causes.) But this year's Global Impact Challenge
portfolio is typical of Google's unique way of giving. Google is
all about approaching poverty and inequality as an engineering
problem, and one of its goals is to democratize tech access for
those in need in new and innovative ways. Improving life for
people with disabilities gives Google.org a unique challenge to
solve with its tech expertise.
Giving, the Google Way
Tech is no stranger to philanthropy. Generations of tech
moguls, from Bill Gatesto Pierre Omidyar to Marc Benioff have
given away impressive sums of their own wealth-and in doing so,
have invited much scrutiny to the question of how tech can best
approach philanthropy. Google.org, however, claims that it's
different: as an agnostic organization, it says can be more
objective than individuals who might be more passion-driven about
the issues they pick.
In this case, Google.org says it has data-driven reasons for
making disabilities its cause. More than a billion people live
with a disability worldwide. A person with a disability,
regardless of where he or she lives or works, has fewer
opportunities than more able-bodied peers. In a place like the
US, 50 to 70 percent of people with disabilities are unemployed;
in developing nations, that proportion rises to as high as 80 to
90 percent, according to the United Nations. Access is another
concern: Only 5 to 15 percent of people with disabilities in
developing countries have access to the assistive devices they
need, the World Health Organization determined.
What Dot-org says it can uniquely offer is broadening disabled
people's access to services and technology that will improve
their lives, in small and big ways. One obvious way Google.org
can do this is by lending tech expertise to nonprofits to create
efficient, affordable products and services. But Google.org also
wants to give everyone equal access, helping these nonprofits
figure out how to overcome barriers to getting their projects
into the hands of people who need them, whether that's through
upending stodgy insurance models, open sourcing project plans, or
building in customization so that more individuals can find
products designed specifically for their unique conditions. It
also can't hurt that Google is a company with a truly global
reach.
Democratizing Access
The Center for Discovery's indieGo, which Google gave over $1
million, is a model example of a nonprofit that could uniquely
benefit from Google's tech-savviness. The indieGo is a
lightweight frame with a motor that converts any wheelchair into
a powered one. Its inventors are experimenting with a variety of
control mechanisms, from joysticks to touch buttons and
industry-standard switches.
"Someone with a spinal cord injury who has use of their hands,
though not their legs, could use a joystick with this device,"
John Damaio, creator of the indieGo system, says. "But you can
take this to another patient who maybe doesn't have use of their
hands, but has use of their head and neck, to drive with their
head using the same device." Because its tech is more
sophisticated, a power wheelchair with head and neck controls
could cost thousands of dollars more than a joystick-controlled
chair, Damaio says. Meanwhile, the indieGo is aiming to go on
the market for about $1,000-significantly lower than other power
wheelchairs out there.
The nonprofit also plans to cut out middlemen, so that users
who need the assistive device can order it directly. Perhaps
most significant of all: the indieGo device plan is open source,
right in line with Dot-org's criteria. If all goes well,
according to its road map developed in conjunction with
Google.org, indieGo could be ready for manufacturing within two
years.
Yes, the indieGo team has lofty goals. But they think they can
get there. "The nice thing is, Dot-org isn't just giving us
money and stepping away," McNamara says, anticipating that the
team will need help soon, especially when it comes to specific
technical questions-like how to extend their device's battery
life. "I assume with Google's driverless car, that they have a
whole slew of battery experts," McNamara says. "We could reach
out to them and ask for advice on the batteries that we are going
to be using in our own device."
There's no way to know now whether all of Google.org's bets
will succeed. More likely than not, these nonprofits won't hit
every single one of their targets. But risk is inherent to
philanthropy, as Google knows-and that's to say nothing of the
increased public scrutiny on such a high-profile institutional
organization. Whether its investments succeed or fail,
Dot-org-and its beneficiaries-are revealing a unique way to do
tech philanthropy. And it's one way that may well shape our
expectations for how philanthropy is done by other very wealthy
and very powerful organizations in the future.
VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
Archived on the World Wide Web at
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
Signoff: [log in to unmask]
Subscribe: [log in to unmask]
|