BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dustin Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Jul 2015 23:34:30 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
I'm thinking about just saving up and getting either the 2000 or   start with the 480, and maybe getting the 2000 or maybe even the 590… later on down the road…

Sent from iPhone 

> On Jul 20, 2015, at 11:10 PM, howard kaufman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Well that would give different answers for every question.
> You could argue the basic kx-3 for cost, but not if you need 100 watts, a
> wider range tuner, 2 meters and 440 MHZ and speech.  Each options adds to
> the purchase price.  The k-3 is similar, but the 100 watt amplifier fits in
> the same case as the radio, which makes it less portable.  The k-3 does its
> functions using more hardware, while the k-3 does it all with software.
> So you see, the answer gets complicated.  Its rather like buying a house,
> what is essential, and what can you compromise on?
> There is no best, the question is what is the best for you?
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Dustin Thompson
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 9:44 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Accessible Transceivers
> 
>>> All of the above=E2=80=A6

ATOM RSS1 RSS2