I used QTH.COM.

Bob kd0br


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Scott Gillen
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 4:43 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Amateur Radio Vanity Callsign fees to be eliminated

What is a good place to search for available calls?

Scott

Sent from my iPhone

On 24/05/2015, at 3:42 AM, Fred Adams <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Sorry but I deleted it already and my deleted folder has been cleaned 
> out to.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Tom Behler
> Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 11:33 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Amateur Radio Vanity Callsign fees to be eliminated
> 
> Fred:
> 
> I'm not finding the NPRM in your e-mail.
> 
> I'm obviously missing something.
> 
> Would like to forward it onto others if you have it.
> 
> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Fred Adams
> Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 7:26 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: FW: Amateur Radio Vanity Callsign fees to be eliminated
> 
> Subject: RE: Amateur Radio Vanity Callsign fees to be eliminated (TCW)
> 
> This is very interesting and not totally clear. There are two distinct 
> fees regarding Vanity Call Signs; the initial application fee and the 
> renewal fee. This NPRM clearly states that the application fees are to 
> be eliminated but it is not clear if the renewal fees are also to be 
> eliminated. There is no redundancy in fee collections for renewals as 
> there is for multiple applications for the same call sign. Time will tell.
>