BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Matthew Chao <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 May 2015 07:11:07 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
Then 40 it is.  7191?

Matt.

At 06:49 AM 5/20/2015 -0400, you wrote:
>We would have to try 40 or 75.  Probably 40 would be the best.
>
>Don
>
>
>On 5/19/2015 9:45 AM, Matthew Chao wrote:
> > Hey, Don.  We should link up one of these days.  Whhich band is best
> > for you?--Matt.
> >
> > P.S.  Also spoke with a guy out in northern CA, WB6UQT, north of San
> > Francisco on 15 meters.
> >
> > At 06:16 AM 5/19/2015 -0400, you wrote:
> >> Congrats Matt.
> >>
> >> Awesome!
> >>
> >> Don
> >>
> >> w a 2 i w c
> >>
> >>
> >> On 5/18/2015 7:42 PM, Matthew Chao wrote:
> >>> Hi, Folks.  Great news!  I got my first DX contact since getting my
> >>> general ticket.  Spoke with OK2RZ, Jiri in the Czech Republic at
> >>> 5:05PM  today on 14.26701Mhz.  He was running a gallon, and I only
> >>> had 100 watts.  Quite a kick.  Who says ham radio isn't fun,
> >> hi.--Matt, N1IBB.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2