BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jim Gammon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:49:52 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
John, a ham friend of mine had one of those bearcat scanners and 
as I remember, they ran very warm temperature wise and also had a 
lot of synthesizer noise.  The Regency model ran much cooler and 
as I recall, didn't have nearly as much background noise on 
signals.  Jim WA6EKS

 ----- Original Message -----
From: "John J.  Jacques" <[log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]
Date sent: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:10:44 -0700
Subject: Re: Old Regency scanner and Optacon

Hi Jim, I remember that scanner, it was a hot receiver, as I 
recall!  I
also had a Barecat 101, or 100, that used the same idea, but was
programmed with the 16 channel lock-out switches on the front, 
and had
one of the hottest receivers I have ever seen in a scanner!  I 
used to
know the formula to convert the frequency to that binary number, 
so I
could make the scanner go to frequencies that weren't listed in 
the book!

73:
John

John Jacques
Amateur Radio Station: KD8PC
"Whare Cat Is, Is civilization!"
Robert A Heinlein
http://www.johnjacques.weebly.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2