BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Colin McDonald <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Apr 2015 22:24:27 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
From Wikipedia, for SMA:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMA_connector

From Wikipedia for BNC:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BNC_connector

Isn't the internet wonderful.
Asking which one is better is like asking a Ford lover and a Shevvy lover 
which is the better car maker.
They've both got their advantages and disadvantages.
They both tend to be less lossy at higher frequencies compared to a UHF 
connector, or what some call a PL259 male,  or SO239 female.
They're both a pain in the ass to put on coaxes lol.

73
Colin, V A6BKX

-----Original Message----- 
From: David Pearson
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 9:51 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: question

Hi All:
I hear the terms   "sma", and" bnc"used frequently(especially with regard to
HT's).  Do these 3 letter designations actually stand for something, and if
so, what, and what are the advantages/disadvantages of each type?

Best regards,



David S. Pearson-wa4dsp


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus 
protection is active.
http://www.avast.com 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2