BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:52:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
It would be interesting, but I've never heard anyone doing that.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Pearson" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 9:18 AM
Subject: antenna height measurement question


> Hi:
>
> If a person's QTH is in an elevated area(Denver, for example), which is
> nicknamed the "mile-high city", and they tell you that their hex beam is
> mounted at a height of 50 feet, it seems to me that this figure should be
> added to the QTH's elevation to have a more accurate height  Is this 
> valid,
> or is this a faulty assumption         ?
>
> Sincerely yours,
>
>
>
> David S. Pearson-wa4dsp.
>
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus 
> protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2