Yes, but often the computer option isn't all that pratical. I use to
control my service monitor with a computer program I wrote, it worked
and worked well, but sure was not a good solution in the field, say
checking out a system on to of a grain elevator. Rob wrote a program
for the ham pod and it is fantastic. Yes, cost me $300, but I sure
would never go back to the computer. For me, the computer is better
than nothing, but just barely.
73
Butch
WA0VJR
Node 3148
Wallace, ks.
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, howard kaufman wrote:
> The problem is that the computer option
> Is affordable and often works. Ham radiomore integrated every day.
> If I could hook up a talking meter or frequency counter to my computer, why
> would I pay hundreds of dollars for a dedicated stand alone solution?
> Time and technology march on. Their has to be a market for what ever is
> invented and sold.
>
> A.M. lost out to sideband, because sideband did the job better. The A.M
> that is left is there, because some people value the things it does better
> than sideband.
> What there is a need for, is an accessible DVD player and DVR recorder.
> Those would have markets much wider than the ham radio market.
> and software are becoming
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Bob Ray
> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 7:01 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: What would we like to improve our ham radio
>
> I think the day is rapidly approaching when it is going to be necessary to
> read the display. You look at these new digital radios from icom yaesu and
> many others you see the need to program many of the functions. Computer
> interfacing is of course one option but it isn't always the option we would
> like.
>
> Bob
> and others
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Jim Gammon
> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 12:03 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: What would we like to improve our ham radio
>
> what about a device that would read displays? Many rigs like the Yaesu 857
> are tonally inaccessible which is very frustrating since they are all mode,
> cover 160 through 440 MHZ like the Kenwood 2000 and are much more compact.
> Yah I know reading a display using a external device would be tedious, but
> who knows what else it might read, Scanners, the radio kind, microwave
> ovens, other kitchen appliances, who knows? Jim WA6EKS
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: doug and sheilla emerson <[log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date sent: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 09:10:05 -0700
> Subject: Re: What would we like to improve our ham radio
>
> Boy oh boy do I sure like the idea of a light probe designed to see l e d
> readouts! I think that's the best idea I've heard since I was born! Doug,
> N6NFF
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Behler
> Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2015 6:47 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: What would we like to improve our ham radio
>
> Terry and all:
>
> I still think a stand-alone affordable talking watt/SWR meter to replace the
> TW1 and TW2 is essential.
>
> Also, an affordable stand-alone talking antenna analyzer would be
> beneficial.
>
> Finally, how about a newly-designed and affordable light probe for reading
> LED read-outs and the like.
>
> In saying all of this, I know there are some on this list who are at various
> stages of designing or at least considering the design of these items, so
> I'd not want to duplicate efforts.
>
> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Terry Robinson
> Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2015 9:23 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: What would we like to improve our ham radio
>
> Hi all,
>
> The RSGB President collared me last night at the GMDX Convention.
> The =
> Society wants to do something (spending some capital) that would be of =
> benefit to its members and enhancing the amateur radio experience for =
> people with disabilities is one thing that's being considered.
>
> Whilst this initiative would be aimed at RSGB members in particular, it =
> could also be of potential benefit to others.
>
> I'm in no position to make promises and have no part in the decision =
> making process.
>
> I was asked, however, to come up with suggestions and I'm concerned that = I
> don't just propose a re-invention of the wheel.
>
> So, what would we really like? Power meters have been mentioned, but I =
> think these already exist, albeit in some expensive options. I had some =
> thoughts about the experience with digital modes, but perhaps there are =
> already solutions here too.
>
> So, come on, let's hear it and I'll try to draw some kind of = constructive
> consensus.
>
> Cheers and 73,
>
> Terry
>
>
>
> ************************************************************
>
> DESCRIBE ONLINE - IMPROVING ACCESS THROUGH INFORMATION
>
> Terry Robinson B.Sc
> 82 Albert Rd.
> Crosshill
> Glasgow
> G42 8DR
> Tel: 0141 423 2683 - Mobile: 07771 610002
> Web: www.describe-online.com
>
>
|
