Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 6 May 2015 13:43:55 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
That's something I've always wondered; if the opponents of sign language are
primarily of the hearing impaired community, or outside that community who
work in it claiming to know what's best for them.
Harvey
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Chuck Lester
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 11:13 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: absolutely nothing to do with ham radio but Dayton made me
think about it.
Harvey,
Just like those who can hear and see to tell both those who can''t hear or
see the best way. I mean after all, they have all five senses, who could
argue with that. Of course, this completely discounts the human brain and
the other guy/gal's need to cope with the real environment. To take away a
usable tool, just because, you don't think I need it, is absolutely silly.
It sounds so political. Besides, I don't want to teach sign language. And,
I don't want to teach Braille. That mentality runs congress.
Chuck wa8vmo
|
|
|