BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: AT 1000 pro question:
From:
Don Breda <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:04:36 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines) 
Thanks Guys.  Thats what I thought but wanted to check.

Don

On 1/20/2015 8:38 AM, John Vernaleken` wrote:
> Don
> Since you know the seller price sounds reasonable. I think from what I read
> the Meter option is the difference in the Pro II.
>
> John  KC2QJB
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Don Breda
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 7:31 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: AT 1000 pro question:
>
> A friend of mine is selling his at1000pro for $325.
>
> It is the pro not the newer pro 2.
>
> Besides the different meters in the pro 2 which of  course don't help us at
> all are there any other differences that make it  a better idea to spend the
> extra money and get a pro2?
>
> Do you gys think $325 is a good price for a used at1000pro?
>
> I might like to see him go a bit lower but what I feel I am paying for is
> the knowlege that this tuner will be in great shape and nothing will have
> been cooked inside.
>
> This is one device I would never usually buy used for just such a reason.
>
> Any thoughts appreciated.
>
> Don
>
> w a 2 i w c

ATOM RSS1 RSS2