BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lou Kolb <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 27 Sep 2014 21:00:07 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
The balun on that thing seems to be problematic. However. they work so well 
that, If you can possibly replace it, i'd do so. Everyone I know who uses 
one is quite pleased with it, balun issues not withstanding. Good luck. Lou 
WA3MIX
Lou Kolb
Voice-over Artist:
Radio/TV Ads, Video narrations
Messages On-hold:
www.loukolb.com
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pat Byrne" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2014 8:11 PM
Subject: Antenna problem


>I hate to re-introduce things that have already been discusssed but I
> am having a problem with my Carolina Windem.  The last time i was on
> forty meters, the G5RV outperformed the Windem significantly.  I will
> try more comparisons but perhaps the ballun has failed and I am
> looking at a replacement.  My back yard situation makes raising and
> lowering the antenna a bit problematic and finding eyes attached to
> good antena folks is dificult, so I am thinking it is time to do
> something different when I round up that antenna crew.
> I can do sixty-six feet either side of open wire line reasonably
> easily and could have a balun where the feed line comes in to the
> crawl space.  I want a 75 and forty meter antena that will do a
> credible job.  And of course I could replace the balun on the
> existing setup.  The Windem has done very well when it is right.
> What is the collective wisdom?
> Thanks.
> Pat, K9JAU 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2