BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 4 Feb 2015 11:21:31 -0500
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Subject:
Re: It looks like bye-bye for Radio Shack.
From:
Matthew Chao <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines) 
I used to call them Radio Scraps, because when I bought parts (SUCH 
AS JACKS AND ADAPTERS), some of them would fall apart shortly 
afterwords.--Matt, N1IBB.

At 08:49 AM 2/4/2015 -0500, you wrote:
>I'm surprised they lasted this long.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Matthew Chao" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 8:37 AM
>Subject: Re: It looks like bye-bye for Radio Shack.
>
>
> > Interesting.  It's bad enough that their selection isn't the
> > greatest.  The link sort of explains all that.--Matt, N1IBB.
> >
> > At 02:41 PM 2/3/2015 -0500, you wrote:
> >>Forwarded message:
> >>
> >>I was just sent the following link about Radio Shack:
> >>http://www.arrl.org/news/radioshack-s-long-slow-downward-slide-nea 
> rs-the-end

ATOM RSS1 RSS2