BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Butch Bussen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:18:45 -0700
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (38 lines)
Yep,, and there have been more messages about high traffic than the 
traffic itself.  I personally get a lot of good info on this list and it 
really isn't that high traffic, not compared to some I'm on.  It is 
simple, delte messages or don't.  If you have more to do than hit a 
delete key, try some other list.  It isn't going to change.  Only thing 
I pay attention to on any lists I'm on are notes from the list owner.
73
Butch
WA0VJR
Node 3148
Wallace, ks.


On 
Tue, 2 Sep 2014, John Miller wrote:

> And thanking people for private emails on a list where very few if anyone
> even knows about the emails is better than worthless junk how?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alan R. Downing" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 8:32 AM
> Subject: Re: The value of our Blind Hams list
>
>
>> I wish to thank all of you that have written to me privately in agreement
>> with my objection to the many useless and unnecessary posts to this list.
>> Clearly I am not the only member that has a problem with the traffic level
>> on this list, and in particular, to all of the time-wasting posts to it.
>>
>> 73
>>
>>
>> Alan R. Downing
>> Phoenix, AZ
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2