Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 3 Apr 2015 08:33:43 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Oh, I hate putting them on coaxes, those motorola mini UHF connectors are no
better.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2015 12:24 AM
Subject: Re: question
> From Wikipedia, for SMA:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMA_connector
>
> From Wikipedia for BNC:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BNC_connector
>
> Isn't the internet wonderful.
> Asking which one is better is like asking a Ford lover and a Shevvy lover
> which is the better car maker.
> They've both got their advantages and disadvantages.
> They both tend to be less lossy at higher frequencies compared to a UHF
> connector, or what some call a PL259 male, or SO239 female.
> They're both a pain in the ass to put on coaxes lol.
>
> 73
> Colin, V A6BKX
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Pearson
> Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 9:51 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: question
>
> Hi All:
> I hear the terms "sma", and" bnc"used frequently(especially with regard
> to
> HT's). Do these 3 letter designations actually stand for something, and
> if
> so, what, and what are the advantages/disadvantages of each type?
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> David S. Pearson-wa4dsp
>
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
> protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
|
|
|