Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BLIND-HAMS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BLIND-HAMS Home BLIND-HAMS Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Contesting Methodology
From:
Phil Scovell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Mar 2015 21:53:21 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
I heard something tonight during the ssb contest I don't believe I've heard 
before but often wondered why it couldn't be done; especially with two CW 
operators.  In this case, PJ4G was on 15 sideband when I first heard them. 
I listened for quite awhile and suddenly realized something had changed.  At 
first, I thought they had changed operators but as I continued listening to 
the exchanges made, the voice of PJ4G changed again.  I listened more and 
heard the other voice, that is, another operator, answering stations and 
making the exchange.  The only real reason I noticed this was the second 
voice was British while the first sounded Midwestern.  Plus, the original 
voice I copied had hum on his voice occasionally.  I'm assuming they were 
using two microphones on one transmitter and whoever picked out a call 
first, or jotted down two or three calls in the pile up that the primary 
operator had missed, answered and made the contact.  I noticed it was 2 or 
more calls as if they had been jotted down.  I always figured this could be 
done easily on CW and while two worked a channel, a second transmitter would 
be used to search and pounce.  I also enjoy listening to the phonetic reply 
digital reply programs that some of the stations are using.  I frankly think 
that would slow the exchange down vocally since the response is repeated 
phonetically instead of just replying with letters and numbers but then 
again, I noticed the station operator occasionally answering without the 
phonetic responder.  All in all, times have changed.  I wonder if we will 
get to computers working computers while we go out skiing or to the beach 
during the contest weekend, haha.

Phil.
K0NX

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV