BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Butch Bussen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 11 Oct 2014 12:33:59 -0700
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (13 lines)
Yep I agree with all of your comments on the 480.  Also, I think the 
controls make a little more sense on the 590 as far as wi writing to 
memory, memory to vfo and so forth.  The 590 has separate rf and af tain 
controls, I always that was strange the way you ahve to set rf tain on the 
480.  Dsp is much better in the 590, it is just a quieter receiver. 
Again, nothing wrong with a 480, the 590 is just newer and can take 
advantage of advances in the technology.
73
Butch
WA0VJR
Node 3148
Wallace, ks.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2