BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tom Behler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 27 Sep 2014 19:21:51 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (121 lines)
I'll check it out, Butch. ... Thanks!

Tom Behler: KB8TYJ


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Butch Bussen
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2014 4:10 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: TCXO Module For TS590

I don't have the link, but you can by the Chineese one on ebay for around
$35 I think.  Well worth it I think.
73
Butch
WA0VJR
Node 3148
Wallace, ks.


On Sat, 27 Sep 2014, Tom 
Behler wrote:

> Actually, Steve, if I ever were to use the TS590 out here in the RV, where
> temps do fluctuate more than in a regular house, this might be something
> worth thinking about.
>
> Just thinking out loud here.
>
> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Steve Dresser
> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2014 2:06 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: TCXO Module For TS590
>
> Tom,
>
> If the rig seems stable enough to you, don't spend the money.  On the =
> other hand, file the option for later use if you ever become aware of =
> drift.  Another reason for wanting a TCXO is if you operate in a wide =
> range of temperatures, in which case the drift might be more noticeable.
>
> Steve
>
> ----- Original Message -----=20
> From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2014 12:59
> Subject: Re: TCXO Module For TS590
>
>
>> Thanks, Steve.
>> =20
>> In my HF cw work on 10 through 160 meters, I  haven't noticed any =
> problems.
>> I very rarely use 6 meters, and don't think I have ever even had a =
> 6-meter
>> CW QSO, in my 20 years with my KB8TYJ call.
>> =20
>> If what you are saying is true, then I'm thinking it may not be worth
>> =
> my
>> while, at least at this point.
>> =20
>> Will be interested in thoughts from anyone else, of course.
>> =20
>> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>> =20
>> =20
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: For blind ham radio operators =
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of Steve Dresser
>> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2014 12:06 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: TCXO Module For TS590
>> =20
>> Tom,
>> =20
>> I think the TCXO module is most helpful if you are doing work on 6 =3D
>> =
> meters,
>> but of less significance on the lower frequencies.
>> =20
>> Steve
>> =20
>> ----- Original Message -----=3D20
>> From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2014 11:50
>> Subject: TCXO Module For TS590
>> =20
>> =20
>>> Hello, everyone.
>>> =3D20
>>> I know this will be a matter of opinion, but is the TCXO crucial for
>>> =
> =3D
>> someone
>>> like me who does a lot of CW operating?  I realize that is probably =
> =3D
>> more
>>> essential for other HF digital modes, but those modes are not of =3D
>> interest to
>>> me.
>>> =3D20
>>> The question is simply on my mind lately, due to some recent =3D
>> discussion on
>>> both this list, and the TS590 Yahoo groups list.
>>> =3D20
>>> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>>
>>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2