BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jim Gammon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 16 Aug 2014 10:37:16 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (240 lines)
I think that in general, counties and states have been sold a 
pipe dream when it comes to the new digital trunked systems.  
They are very complex.  A few years ago, I heard Richmond CA's 
trunked system go down and in a few hours when it became evident 
that there were some serious issues, the county sheriff folks 
came out with a truck load of handheld radios for the local cops 
to use while they were fixing the Edacs trunked system.  More 
recently, Oakland's problem-ridden trunked system went down when 
the POTUS was in town and I think Oakland has recently decided to 
scrap their hugely expensive system and join the EBRCS system 
used by Alameda and Contra Costa County that has come online over 
the past couple years.  In all fairness, that EBRCS p25     
system seems to work alright but for the kind of garbled sound 
you sometimes hear but maybe that's just on kind of cheap 
scanners.  Actually one of the reasons for trunking namely 
sharing frequencies, is a very sound one when you think of say a 
conventional frequency used by a fire department that may only be 
used a few times each hour, but my opinion still hasn't changed 
about the hype and complexity that has gone into the new systems.  
I really do hope that many agencies hold on to their old 
conventional frequencies for a long time.  I could go on about 
this but will not.  Jim WA6EKS

>----- Original Message -----
>From: Butch Bussen <[log in to unmask]
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Date sent: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 07:38:05 -0700
>Subject: Re: Programming a PSR500?

>THis is I think their third attempt.  When I first moved there, 
the
>state blew 20 million or so on a vhf system fro motorola and had 
to
>scrap that one as they weren't licensed.  Of course, the guy who 
was in
>charge of that had just retired.  hmmmmm.  They then spent 
another twenty
>mil on something else which didn't work, and now they're messing 
with
>this desert sky system.  When I left in 2010, one of the main 
techs was
>in our ham club and he said it wasn't any good.  Audio sounded 
like you
>were blowing bubbles througha straw.
>73
>Butch
>WA0VJR
>Node 3148
>Wallace, ks.


>On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Ron Miller
>wrote:

>> Hi Butch,
>> Yes, LV has gone to Open Sky (called desert sky for their 
system) but are
>> extremely dissatisfied with it.  They proposed switching to a 
P25 system but
>> have not yet done so.  I suspect budget constraints are holding 
them back.
>> The article I read indicated they invested a lot in the desert 
sky system.

>> Ron Miller


>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: For blind ham radio operators 
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of Butch Bussen
>> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 11:00 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Programming a PSR500?

>> I have a rat shack pro 433 and a hand held 528, take the same 
programming
>> software.  This software doesn't talk at all.  I did get it 
programmed when
>> I lived in Vegas, I subscribed to some data base and finally 
figured how to
>> have it download the file to the scanner, but it wasn't very 
speech friendly
>> either, and I haven't even unpacked the thing since I moved back 
to Kansas.
>> I think h p has gone trunking and some cities have gone to some 
sort of
>> digital that can't be received by any scanner.  I'm told Vegas 
has since
>> gone to blue sky or something like that which can't be monitored 
either.
>> 73
>> Butch
>> WA0VJR
>> Node 3148
>> Wallace, ks.


>> On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, Jim
>> Gammon wrote:

>>> Colin, have you been able to manually program a PSR500? You have 
much
>>> more knowledge or patience than I do.  Jim WA6EKS

>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: Colin McDonald <[log in to unmask]
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Date sent: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 19:13:10 -0600
>>>> Subject: Re: accessible scanners

>>>> that is a pretty subjective question...
>>>> It really depends on how familiar you are with programming 
logic,
>>> and how
>>>> trunked systems are programmed, or if you use radio reference 
and
>>> that sort
>>>> of thing.
>>>> These days, using radio reference to program your scanner makes
>>> them nearly
>>>> plug and play devices...but for those of us who have used
>>> scanners for many
>>>> years had to deal with manual programming on radios that didn't
>>> offer any
>>>> sort of real accessible feedback...but were also all 
programmable
>>> via the
>>>> keypad...so as long as you can work out a key chart for a
>>> particular
>>>> scanner, most of them are usable, though not to the point where
>>> you can
>>>> always be sure of a particular state, IE, which banks or groups
>>> are turned
>>>> on or off at any given point etc, or what the display shows and
>>> so on.
>>>> Anyway, out of the box, with a little learning, you should be
>>> fine.
>>>> The manuals are online and the best way to learn any new piece 
of
>>> gear is
>>>> through trial and error...you really can't screw anything up
>>> beyond what a
>>>> reset can fix.
>>>> I usually learn the programming by entering a system in a few
>>> times and
>>>> resetting so I can get the hang of it before entering a whole
>>> bunch of
>>>> systems and frequencies in, just to find out after that I did
>>> something
>>>> wrong.
>>>> Plugging into radio reference will program the scanner for you
>>> and set
>>>> everything up in a nice easy to use manner...but I believe there
>>> is a
>>>> fee...but it works well if you travel or go between counties or
>>> cities where
>>>> there are allot of systems.
>>>> Upgrade to the psr800 and you get an SD card that you can load
>>> all your
>>>> systems on to, and record scanner audio as well.

>>>> 73
>>>> Colin, V A6BKX
>>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>>> From: "Matthew Chao" <[log in to unmask]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 6:20 PM
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: Re: accessible scanners

>>>>> How easy is it to program out of the box?--Matt, N1IBB.

>>>>> At 05:23 PM 8/14/2014, you wrote:
>>>>>> I highly recommend the PSR-500...on tests with very high end 
test
>>>>>> equipment the GRE PSR-500 has measurably better receiver
>>>>>> sensativity.
>>>>>> The audio is excellent as well and very easy to hear even in
>>> noisy
>>>>>> environments.

>>>>>> 73
>>>>>> Colin, V A6BKX
>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> From: "Matthew Chao" <[log in to unmask]
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 2:43 PM
>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]
>>>>>> Subject: Re: accessible scanners

>>>>>>> Which one would you guys recommend:  the bcd396, or this
>>> one?--Matt,
>>>>>>> N1IBB.

>>>>>>> At 02:33 PM 8/14/2014, you wrote:
>>>>>>>> Russ, It's a handheld scanner.  Jim WA6EKS

>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>>> From: Russ Kiehne <[log in to unmask]
>>>>>>>>> To: [log in to unmask] Date sent: Thu, 14 Aug 2014
>>>>>>>>> 08:37:24 -0700
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: accessible scanners

>>>>>>>>>       Is the psr500 a base or handheld scanner?

>>>>>>>>> On 8/14/2014 8:27 AM, Ron Miller wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi  ,
>>>>>>>>>> Yes it does decode P25.

>>>>>>>>>> Also, Jim, I am most definitely not saying that we should
>>>>>>>> discourage Whistle=
>>>>>>>>>> r from designing accessibility features into their scanner
>>>>>>>> receivers.  Quite t=
>>>>>>>>>> he contrary, I am all for it.  In fact, I had begun a dialog
>>>>>>>> with the folks a=
>>>>>>>>>> t GRE America on this very subject.

>>>>>>>>>> The intent of my post was simply to respond to a previous
>>>>>>>> message about Whis=
>>>>>>>>>> tler's current scanner line and to say that I'm successfully
>>>>>>>> using the PSR-5=
>>>>>>>>>> 00 along with PSREdit and the Whistler version of this scanner
>>>>>>>> should be equ=
>>>>>>>>>> ally usable.

>>>>>>>>>> BTW, Russ, if we can work out a time, I would be glad to chat
>>>>>>>> with you about=
>>>>>>>>>>   how I use PSREdit.

>>>>>>>>>> 73,

>>>>>>>>>> Ron Miller
>>>>>>>>>> N6MSA

>>>>>>>>>> Ron Miller

>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 14, 2014, at 10:11 AM, Russ Kiehne <[log in to unmask]
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> =20
>>>>>>>>>>> Does the psr500 do p25?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2