BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:08:30 -0700
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Forcing TS480SAT into LSB when Using CW
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
From:
Butch Bussen <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (14 lines) 
Shouldn't be any difference as far as noise.  AS far as near band edge, if 
you say are on 3.998, 2kc down from 4.00, your transmitted energy is below 
that on lower side band.  If you switch side bands, you're roughly 3 kc 
above and anything  above 2 kc puts you out of band.  When you switched 
side bands on older rigs, some switched filters and others switched the 
crystal in the carrier oscilator.  If crystals were switched, you actually 
moved frequency on receive and transmit because the output of that circuit 
is switched.  Hope that makes sense.
73
Butch
WA0VJR
Node 3148
Wallace, ks.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2