BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Phil Scovell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Oct 2014 09:39:25 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (52 lines)
Alan,

I use the 495 but the less expensive one, I forget the model number, works 
just as well.  The 495 isn't that much more expensive and has a lot more 
features from which to choose on the other hand.  I sure like the 495 as a 
stand alone unit rather than software driven CW programs.

Phil.
K0NX




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alan R. Downing" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 8:57 AM
Subject: Further on MFJ-495


> Since my hands and fingers are still stable enough  for typing, I want to
> see if sending CW via keyboard will help me reduce "shakiness errors" that 
> I
> am experiencing using my Begali iambic magnetic paddle.
>
>
>
> As I previously indicated, I'm interested in any comments regarding 
> personal
> experience with the model 495.
>
>
>
> Thanks again.
>
>
>
> Alan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Alan R. Downing
>
> Phoenix, AZ
>
>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2