Richard,
The more the better. The longer the better. Practically speaking
you do what you can within reality. Years ago on 160 meters a friend
and I would plant a new radial every so often and he could see
definite signal increases on my signal until I had a half dozen or so
wires out. After that I guess it became academic - the S meter no
longer saw improvement but I am sure that there was some theoretical
difference. Enough for scientific studies!!
Solid/not solid shoulnd't make any difference. Good luck.
Pat, K9JAUAt 07:12 AM 7/2/2014, you wrote:
>Hi!
>
>
>
>Soon, I will install a 43' HF (160M - 6M) antenna. I have a few questions
>about setting up the radials for this antenna, as follows:
>
>
>
>1. The manual for the antenna recommends using 18 gauge wire. Would using
>a larger gauge wire (e.g., 16 gauge( be better? Since my radial system will
>not be ideal (see below), I wonder if increasing the gauge of the wire might
>be helpful.
>
>
>
>2. Does it matter if the wire is solid copper or braided copper? Is one
>better than the other? Also, should the wire be a) insulated or b)
>uninsulated? Does it matter, or is one better than the other?
>
>
>
>3. These radials will not be buried in small trenches in the ground.
>Instead, the end of each radial will be "staked" into the ground, and also
>likely a few "stakes" along each radial's length. So, regarding the
>"stakes", is it OK that they are metal? Is it better if these stakes are
>insulated, similar to the wire? Would plastic or wood stakes be any or much
>better?
>
>
>
>I think I will be able to layout about 16 radials. However, not each will
>be the height of the antenna (maybe half of them will be), their layout will
>not be symmetrical (like spokes on a wheel) and about 180 degrees radius off
>of the antenna will not have radials extending outward in this quadrant.
>
>
>
>Finally, are there any tricks I can employ to improve my radial system? For
>example, I think I once heard of someone laying down chicken wire around the
>antenna base. Is something like that beneficial?
>
>
>
>73,
>
>Richard KK6MRH
|