How does the VFO and Step Fine Tuning operate on these two radios? Do
they have like a click that you can feel as you're turning them or some
kind of beep or something? Are these analog or digital?
Thanks
Jeff
KC9UIE
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Oyen <[log in to unmask]>
To: BLIND-HAMS <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Mon, May 19, 2014 12:48 pm
Subject: Re: Kenwood TS-2000 Versus TS-590
you could always try the TS-480. I have one here and It works nicely. I
=
haven't figured out all the controls on it yet (I only got the silly =
thing about 3 weeks ago). Like the 590, its a more recent vintage and =
can also be computer controlled (haven't tried that yet).
-eric
n7zzt
On May 19, 2014, at 9:04 AM, Steve Forst wrote:
> Richard,
>=20
> I have both in the shack, and a large number of folks on this list =
have,=20
> or have had both of these rigs. I'm sure you will get a lot of =
input=20
> on this, but it all comes down to what you want to do in the hobby.
>=20
> The 2000 came out as you might guess, in 2000, and while some
internal=20=
> changes have been made over the years, it is not the latest =
technology.=20
> I think the 590 came out in late 2010, for whatever that's worth.
>=20
>=20
> You can't use the new VGS-1 in the 2000. Won't fit, won't work.
>=20
> The 2000 is very accesible despite the older voice board, and the
590=20=
> speaks a bit more. Since this is all new to you, you will have a =
steep=20
> learning curve with either one, but lot's of help on this list.
>=20
>=20
> The TNC in the 2000 is kind of limited, but it is there. Although
I=20=
> think the need for control software is a bit overblown, the free
590=20=
> software works well with JAWS. The free software for the 2000
is=20=
> only for menus and memories, but there is other stuff out there
that=20=
> works. Jim in Texas from this list has been working to get his
radio=20=
> control software working better for the 2000.
>=20
> I know you want to work all bands and get involved in all aspects of =
the=20
> hobby, but few if any hams really do that. You would be happy
with=20=
> either radio.
>=20
> Again, what do you want to do? Work local repeaters? or only
Work=20=
> stations across the country or around the world? I know you
mentioned=20=
> some big antenna projects. Realistic, or just caught up in the =
moment?=20
> Big antennas need big supports which means money and labor. If
you=20=
> are going to stay a Tech, the 2000 may be better. Unless you
upgrade,=20=
> or learn morse code, you have serious limitations on the HF bands =
that=20
> may not make the 590 practicle now. Of course, you may be rich,
then=20=
> you can buy one of each.
>=20
> 73, Steve KW3A
>=20
> On 5/19/2014 11:22 AM, Richard B McDonald wrote:
>> Hi!
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> I am trying to decide which is a better rig for me between the =
Kenwood
>> TS-2000 and the Kenwood TS-590. This breaks down into two =
considerations:
>> 1) "accessibility" since I am blind and 2) radio functionality.
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> As far as accessibility, from what I have read the TS-590 seems to
be =
a bit
>> more accessible. However, this difference seems to be small. One =
thing I
>> read from a accessibility review
>> <http://active-elements.org/2012/12/01/kenwood-ts-2000/> of the =
TS-2000 is
>> " The TS-2000 was fitted with the optional VS-3 voice chip. The VS-3
=
has
>> been superseded by the excellent VGS-1 on newer Kenwood's, but gave
>> unparalleled access to Kenwood radios when introduced." Does this =
mean that
>> the VGS-1 chip can be used in the TS-2000 to get its better =
performance.
>> Also, both rigs have a computer control software interface option. =
How
>> accessible are they with JAWS? Any comments about the accessibility
>> differences of these two rigs would be greatly appreciated.
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> As far as radio functionality, the TS-590 seems to be a better HF
rig =
(160 -
>> 6 meters); but that is all its got. On the other hand, the TS-2000 =
has a
>> far more broader range of capabilities: 160 meters - 70 cm; 23 cm =
option,
>> TNC, and on and on. =46rom what I have read, the TS-2000 is a very =
good HF
>> rig; and the difference between it and the TS-590 here are not all =
that
>> great. So, what are your thoughts about the radio functionality =
between
>> these two rigs?
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> Many thanks!
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> 73,
>>=20
>> Richard
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
|
