BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2014 22:47:29 -0400
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original
Subject:
From:
Gary Tillinghast <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
<66B4DF44371E4759B0675AE570459EB1@GaryTPC>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines)
I haven't owned the Wouxun.  I have owned 3 UV5R's and love them.  There is 
a learning curve, but onece mastered it is a good little radio.  There are 
some on this list that have the Baofeng radio.  Gary KB2YAA

-----Original Message----- 
From: Joe Quinn
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 8:46 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Thf6a

Does that radio talk more/better than the wouxun?

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 15, 2014, at 7:40 PM, Gary Tillinghast <[log in to unmask]> 
> wro=
te:
>=20
> If you can't justify the cost of the Kenwood tHF6A, buy the Baofeng UV5R 
> o=
r=20
> the UV82.  You could buy several to equal the cost.  kb2yaa
>=20
> -----Original Message-----=20
> From: Joe Quinn
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 7:55 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Thf6a
>=20
> Is the thf6a a good ht? If no, what others talk besides wouxun? My 0 key 
> i=
s=20
> b=3D
> roken on the wouxun. Thanks!=3D
>=20
>=20
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4040/8395 - Release Date: 
> 10/15/14=20=


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4040/8395 - Release Date: 10/15/14 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2