I haven't used the rigblaster pro but have used all the other rigblasters 
and the signalink USB. I use the signalink USB daily now in fact and really 
like it. I found with the other rigblasters, most plug in to the mic jack of 
the radio and then the mic in to them except the nomic and it ends up you 
have a huge mess of wires everywhere doing that where as the signalink USB 
plugs in to the back so ends up a lot neater. I'm not sure about the 
rigblaster pro, it may connect to the back as well, I really don't see what 
it could do so much better to justify the extra cost though either way. I 
set the signalink up for what I do and haven't even touched it in months, I 
got the levels set where I was told they should be, fine tuned them a tiny 
bit and that was that.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard B McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 9:48 AM
Subject: SignaLink USB Versus RIGblaster Pro


> Hi!
>
>
>
> Which of these is "better"?  I am especially interested in how these two
> interfaces differ when used with the Kenwood TS-2000.
>
>
>
> 73,
>
> Richard KK6MRH