BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jim Gammon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 17 May 2014 12:36:08 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
Hi Alan, yah I know, but this Kenwood thread just seems to have 
taken on a life of its own.  I guess a better way of expressing 
frustration would be to just ask folks to please change the 
subject line.  73, Jim

 ----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan R.  Downing" <[log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]
Date sent: Sat, 17 May 2014 11:46:08 -0700
Subject: Re: Ok already, enough!

Jim, One of the disappointing aspects of this list is that so 
many members
feel obligated to express an opinion about every topic that comes 
up.  I
have been very close to unsubscribing from the list because it is 
largely
inefficient, and of very marginal value.

Just sayin'


Alan R.  Downing
Phoenix, AZ


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators 
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Jim Gammon
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2014 9:17 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Ok already, enough!

Seems like we have beaten this dead horse too many times! Jim
WA6EKS

ATOM RSS1 RSS2