BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jim Gammon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 17 Aug 2014 10:47:17 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Ok Eric and all, thanks for your responses.  I remember checking 
out the Icom at HRO a number of years ago and thinking that it 
was a very frustrating piece of equipment.  It was the receiver 
that had a screen on it so people could see pictures from cameras 
mounted on race cars, something I had no interest in.  73, Jim 
WA6EKS

> ----- Original Message -----
>From: Eric Clegg <[log in to unmask]
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Date sent: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 10:22:35 -0700
>Subject: Re: Pocket wideband receivers??

>HI Jim,
>I think the only two wide band pocket receivers out here now are 
one from
>Icom and one from Alinco.

>Universal Radio carries both of them and the descriptions can be 
found in
>their catalog under wide band receivers.

>I read up on both of them and they are quite a bit more expensive 
than the
>Yaesu VR-500 was.

>I think the Alinco has some sort of rudimentary speech in it.

>I'm not sure how much it reads.

>I also had a Yaesu VR-500 at one time.

>I thought both receivers were needlessly complicated so have not 
bothered
>with any of them.  Others might have other opinions!

>73,

>Eric
>KU3I

ATOM RSS1 RSS2