BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Butch Bussen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:47:11 -0700
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (37 lines)
I don't recdall the exact figures, but it is close to half inch hard 
line, not quite as good, and of course a little more difference on 440. 
If your 9913 is still good, I wouldn't switch it.  I doubt if you'll see 
the difference.  Somewhere, I thought I found a page that listed coax 
losses, but if I recall, it listed so many and I didn't know what the 
numbers were.  I'll do some digging.  THe foam dialectrics have always 
had trouble with moisture and the 99913 is kind of a spiral with air 
space in there, so good place for moisture.  Agai n, unless it is bad, I 
wouldn't change it out.
73
Butch
WA0VJR
Node 3148
Wallace, ks.


On Wed, 18 Jun 2014, Howard Kaufman wrote:

> I can find all kinds of places and prices for lmr-400, but I want to know
> what is the DB loss on 2 meters and 70 CM for 50 and 100 feet lengths?
> For some reason, all I find is that it is low loss.
> What does that mean?
> I talk to stations regularly, that are at a far enough distence, so that
> signal deterioration would be obvious.
> I am trying to figure if their will be a noticable improvement with the
> switch.
>
> H T Kaufman MSW LCSW
> Adaptive Technology Instructor
>
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2