BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard B McDonald <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 May 2014 08:22:18 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
Hi!

 

I am trying to decide which is a better rig for me between the Kenwood
TS-2000 and the Kenwood TS-590.  This breaks down into two considerations:
1) "accessibility" since I am blind and 2) radio functionality.

 

As far as accessibility, from what I have read the TS-590 seems to be a bit
more accessible.  However, this difference seems to be small.  One thing I
read from a accessibility review
<http://active-elements.org/2012/12/01/kenwood-ts-2000/>  of the TS-2000 is
" The TS-2000 was fitted with the optional VS-3 voice chip. The VS-3 has
been superseded by the excellent VGS-1 on newer Kenwood's, but gave
unparalleled access to Kenwood radios when introduced."  Does this mean that
the VGS-1 chip can be used in the TS-2000 to get its better performance.
Also, both rigs have a computer control software interface option.  How
accessible are they with JAWS?  Any comments about the accessibility
differences of these two rigs would be greatly appreciated.

 

As far as radio functionality, the TS-590 seems to be a better HF rig (160 -
6 meters); but that is all its got.  On the other hand, the TS-2000 has a
far more broader range of capabilities: 160 meters - 70 cm; 23 cm option,
TNC, and on and on.  From what I have read, the TS-2000 is a very good HF
rig; and the difference between it and the TS-590 here are not all that
great.  So, what are your thoughts about the radio functionality between
these two rigs?

 

Many thanks!

 

73,

Richard

ATOM RSS1 RSS2