BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Old Re-assigned calls
From:
Jim Stanga <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 18 May 2014 23:48:44 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines) 
Harvey,

Wow! 844, I did not know about that one!

Jim



-----Original Message----- 
From: Harvey Heagy 
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 10:36 PM 
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: Re: Old Re-assigned calls 

Jim, Maybe so, but they keep adding new toll free exchanges, so they aren't
that unnecessary.  I think the latest new toll free exchange is 844.
Harvey

-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Jim Stanga
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 8:46 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Old Re-assigned calls

I gave the toll free number just in caseCarolyn wanted it.
I too have unlimited long distance. I guess toll free numbers are almost 
becoming unnecessary.

Jim
WA5VYL

ATOM RSS1 RSS2