BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
Date:
Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:13:19 -0600
Reply-To:
For blind amateur radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<EFA5DE17BC28406B858095E84901AF26@philscomputer>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind amateur radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Phil Scovell <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Jim,

I was a member of a local club that has two or three repeaters and I learned 
through the grape vine that the owner of the repeaters was writing the 
Novice and Tech tests for people.  I didn't believe it at first but later, 
when he past away, a personal friend of mine said he saw him doing the test 
for even his own wife, my friend's wife I mean, so it is kind of sad.

Phil.
K0NX







----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Shaffer" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: Amateur Radio Licensees in U.S.


> It might also be true that there are some VEs out there basically giving
> away licenses.  There's a big jump after we switched to the VE testers.  I
> do know a fellow who I'm sure can't do junior high arithmetic that's got 
> an
> extra!  I can only imagine how he got it.
>
> I'm kind of prowd of the fact that my extra, back in 1984, was one of the
> last by an FCC examiner.
> --
> Jim, KE5AL

ATOM RSS1 RSS2