BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Russ Kiehne <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 28 May 2014 06:37:36 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
Likewise, I have echolink installed on my ipod touch.

On 5/27/2014 2:01 PM, Anthony Vece wrote:
> So do I!
>
> Sent from my iPhone 5s!
>
>> On May 27, 2014, at 4:57 PM, Doug and Sheilla Emerson <[log in to unmask]> w=
> rote:
>> =20
>> I'd like to see a blind hams echolink net. If we were able to get permisio=
> n=20
>> to use the handiham conference server, it has an IRLP connect to it. The=20=
>
>> IRLP connect is node number 9008. That's channel 8 of the Vancover=20
>> reflector. Hope it happens. 73. Doug, N6NFF
>> =20
>> -----Original Message-----=20
>> From: Butch Bussen
>> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 9:47 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Taking it to the air
>> =20
>> I think it would be more fun on hf.  I don't hhave echo link.  I do have
>> irlp though.
>> 73
>> Butch
>> WA0VJR
>> Node 3148
>> Wallace, ks.
>> =20
>> =20
>>> On Mon, 26 May 2014, Howard Kaufman wrote:
>>> =20
>>> Echolink is fine with me.  That way it would be world wide, the hams with=
>
>>> out HF capabilities could join, and we wouldn't have to miss weeks becaus=
> e
>>> of contests, nets, or thunder storms.
>>> =20
>>> =20
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2