Thanks for the confirmation on both numbers, Jim.
All is well here, although still quite busy, even though the University
teaching year has ended.
One thing for sure is that I'm never bored. (smile)
Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Jim Stanga
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 9:40 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Old Re-assigned calls
Hello Tom:
We are both correct.
I checked this evening and both numbers are good.
I actually was not aware of the toll free number until I checked this
evening.
When I read the number that you provided I recognized it as the one that I
had recently used.
Hope all is well!
73, Jim
WA5VYL
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Behler
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 9:17 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Old Re-assigned calls
Jim:
This is interesting.
Your number differs from the one I gave out. ... And, I just used the number
several weeks ago when I renewed my license.
Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Jim Stanga
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 8:31 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Old Re-assigned calls
Hello:
The toll free number for ARRL in the US is 888-277-5289
--
73
Jim
WA5VYL
-----Original Message-----
From: carolyn johnson
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 7:32 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Old Re-assigned calls
Hi,
Do you have a number for them? I'd like to see it go back into circulation
again.
Carolyn Kj4vt
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 6:40 PM
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Old Re-assigned calls
> Carolyn:
>
> Probably your best and quickest course of action at this point would
> be to call the ARRL for assistance.
>
> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of carolyn johnson
> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 6:11 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Old Re-assigned calls
>
> I'd like to report my husbands death from several months ago, this way
> his call can go into the call pool. Why should it just set there not
> being used?
>
> I have no idea what to do. I tried qrz, and it asks me for a password,
> and I don't have one. He did, and got on their all the time, but I
> have no idea what it was. If anyone wants his call, I'll give it to
> you, and you can ask for it. I'll send all the proof that's needed.
>
> Carolyn Kj4vt
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 6:05 PM
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Old Re-assigned calls
>
>> Hi, all.
>>
>>
>>
>> The discussion of old re-assigned calls gets me thinking:
>>
>>
>>
>> I have always wanted the call K9DOG when or if it becomes available
>> during my lifetime, but I can't even begin to imagine the amount of
>> competition I would have in trying to get it. (huge smile)
>>
>>
>>
>> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>
>>
|
