BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 23:38:25 -0400
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
From:
Steve Forst <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (92 lines)
Tom,

Sorry we didn't cross paths.  It was by far my worst MI QP in memory. 
Once I root out the dozen or soVE3 stations  I worked for the ON QP, I 
may only have  75 or 80 from Michigan.

40 was bad at the start and I walked away from it for a while.     Only 
did a couple on 20 and only a few on CW.    I knew this wasn't going 
anywhere, so  didn't go nuts over it.

I did work W8CUB, but at the time didn't remember it was Lou's friend.


You did very well under the circumstances.  While I heard a few Michigan 
stations with big numbers,  the vast majority were way under 200.

All in all, not my best effort, but best I could do from out of state, 
and I still had fun.



73, Steve KW3A


On 4/19/2014 11:12 PM, Tom Behler wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
>
>
> It's getting late here, and tomorrow is going to be a rather busy Easter
> Sunday, so I thought I'd give you a quick report on my Michigan QSO Party
> effort.
>
>
>
> First of all, band conditions on 40 were extremely poor, especially at the
> beginning of the contest.  I'd say that, for the first two hours of the
> contest, I only heard a few Michigan stations, which was very unlike the
> situation last year.
>
>
>
> The band did improve as the afternoon went on, but it did take a while.
>
>
>
> 80 was in better shape tonight, but even then, there were substantially
> fewer people on the band than I recall being the case in previous years.
>
>
>
> After a little more than 9 hours of operating, I put 255 contacts into the
> log.  I'd estimate that almost half of those contacts were "out of state"
> contacts.
>
>
>
> I did mostly CQing, and probably spent equal time on SSB and CW.
> Interestingly, I got a much greater number of CW contacts than SSB contacts
> this time around.
>
>
>
> I did manage to work WD9GUT (Jim in Minesota), and a blind ham named Scott
> from a county in the southern part of the state.  His call was W8CUB, and I
> believe Lou knows him rather well.  I also worked Paul (N4PN) from Georgia
> several times, which is always a neat bonus in any contest.
>
>
>
> I think that another reason for the lower than usual number of participants
> was that this year's contest fell on Easter week-end, which is really
> unfortunate.
>
>
>
> Anyway, if anyone tried to work me, and I missed you, I truly do apologize.
>
>
>
> This was just one of those days when the HF gods simply were not completely
> on our side.
>
>
>
> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
>
>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2