BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jim Gammon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 May 2014 09:28:57 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (121 lines)
One important difference between the 590 and 2000 is that I don't 
think the 590 covers VHF and UHF.  Am pretty certain it stops at 
6 meters, (54 MHZ) 73, Jim WA6EKS

 ----- Original Message -----
From: Colin McDonald <[log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]
Date sent: Mon, 19 May 2014 09:43:19 -0600
Subject: Re: Kenwood TS-2000 Versus TS-590

Both radios are very accessible.  The ts590 speaks more for sure, 
with voice
readout of swr, power, mike gain, compression and all that 
stuff...the
ts2000 doesn't voice all those things, but it's easy enough to 
determine
your settings anyway by click counting or whatever.
the ts2000 is using 14 year old technology, while the ts590 is 
much much
newer than that...similar performance perhaps ON HF etc, but the 
overall
newer technology gives  the ts590 an edge in receiver 
performance.
It is nice to have everything in one radio though...the vhf and 
UHF sections
of the ts2000 are extremely good, as good as any dual band mobile 
etc.
why you would want to control these particular radios with 
software is
beyond me since that is usually far more cumbersome than using 
the buttons
on the front of the rig.
The ts2000 programming software is accessible and is useful for 
programming
your vhf and uhf channels etc...I presume the ts590's programming 
software
is equally accessible as kenwood software is generally.
Not sure about control software though.

If it's me, I would buy the ts2000.  Better bang for your buck 
right now,
even though it's older technology.  It gives you everything in 
one radio, is
easy to operate and is reasonably accessible.
If your after mostly HF, then the ts590 is definitely the way to 
go.  It's
an excellent little rig and competes with anything else on the 
market.

73
Colin, V A6BKX

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Richard B McDonald" <[log in to unmask]
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 9:22 AM
To: <[log in to unmask]
Subject: Kenwood TS-2000 Versus TS-590

 Hi!



 I am trying to decide which is a better rig for me between the 
Kenwood
 TS-2000 and the Kenwood TS-590.  This breaks down into two 
considerations:
 1) "accessibility" since I am blind and 2) radio functionality.



 As far as accessibility, from what I have read the TS-590 seems 
to be a
 bit
 more accessible.  However, this difference seems to be small.  
One thing I
 read from a accessibility review
 <http://active-elements.org/2012/12/01/kenwood-ts-2000/>  of the 
TS-2000
 is
 " The TS-2000 was fitted with the optional VS-3 voice chip.  The 
VS-3 has
 been superseded by the excellent VGS-1 on newer Kenwood's, but 
gave
 unparalleled access to Kenwood radios when introduced."  Does 
this mean
 that
 the VGS-1 chip can be used in the TS-2000 to get its better 
performance.
 Also, both rigs have a computer control software interface 
option.  How
 accessible are they with JAWS?  Any comments about the 
accessibility
 differences of these two rigs would be greatly appreciated.



 As far as radio functionality, the TS-590 seems to be a better 
HF rig
 (160 -
 6 meters); but that is all its got.  On the other hand, the 
TS-2000 has a
 far more broader range of capabilities: 160 meters - 70 cm; 23 
cm option,
 TNC, and on and on.  From what I have read, the TS-2000 is a 
very good HF
 rig; and the difference between it and the TS-590 here are not 
all that
 great.  So, what are your thoughts about the radio functionality 
between
 these two rigs?



 Many thanks!



 73,

 Richard

ATOM RSS1 RSS2