BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 18 May 2014 21:36:38 -0500
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Old Re-assigned calls
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<3dlm1o00g2kS2SR01dlom8>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
Harvey Heagy <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
Jim, Maybe so, but they keep adding new toll free exchanges, so they aren't
that unnecessary.  I think the latest new toll free exchange is 844.
Harvey

-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Jim Stanga
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 8:46 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Old Re-assigned calls

I gave the toll free number just in caseCarolyn wanted it.
I too have unlimited long distance. I guess toll free numbers are almost 
becoming unnecessary.

Jim
WA5VYL

ATOM RSS1 RSS2