 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Date: |
Sat, 8 Mar 2014 08:40:44 -0700 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
| Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
there is a guy in northern california that makes a device called a ham pod. It can be programmed to interface with the flex (or other SDR). So, the company telling you the flex is graphical only is selling you a line of bull. Also, its not that hard to make a usable interface (they do have the coders for it). guess they just don't want the business of blind hams.
-eric
On Mar 7, 2014, at 4:43 PM, Alan R. Downing wrote:
> I have spoken to Flex directly, as well as to many users of both Flex models
> and the new Apache Labs model, and have been told that all information is
> displayed graphically, including by waterfall displays, and that access to
> blind operators is not possible. Rob Santello might have some understanding
> of this subject that he could share with us.
>
> 73
> Alan/KD7GC
>
>
>
> Alan R. Downing
> Phoenix, AZ
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Michael Ryan
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 11:35 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Flex Radios?
>
> Hi all:
>
> Has anyone ever accessed any of the flex radio transceivers with jaws or WE?
>
> I'm wondering how they'd do as an alternative accessible transceiver.
>
> Mike VO1AX
|
|
|
