BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 06:22:27 -0800
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
From:
Butch Bussen <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (80 lines)
Is this the same Ken who runs shellworld?  Don't know.  If it is, send 
e-mail to him there.
73
Butch
WA0VJR
Node 3148
Wallace, ks.


On Sun, 9 Feb 2014, Phil Scovell wrote:

> The junk characters is a function of what is called the header file.  I have
> a list on this server with no junk characters because there is a header
> setting whereby the junk can be stripped out.  Last time I tried locating
> Ken, he was out of town due to a death in the family.  I can't remember his
> call, if I ever knew it, but fixes are available through a simple change.
> Only list owners, plus listserver managers, have access to the header file
> the control all this so I can't do anything but pass the word along.
>
> Phil.
> K0NX
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2014 6:39 PM
> Subject: Re: New blind-hams list?
>
>
>> All:
>>
>> I guess I would not be opposed to such a thing, but I do have some
>> concerns.
>>
>> 1.  Last I knew, there was a list moderator.  I believe his name was
>> Richard
>> or Robert Scott, but I could be mistaken on that.  I would think the
>> current
>> moderator should be informed of, and possibly involved with, any decision
>> regarding a possible switch in list location.  I also strongly believe
>> that
>> any moderators should be acknowledged  sincerely for their services, since
>> moderating a list is often one of those thankless jobs.
>>
>> 2.  I think it would be important to be sure that the problems we
>> currently
>> are having would not be duplicated on other list web sites.  Perhaps they
>> wouldn't, but we would want to be sure.
>>
>> 3.  All current list members would have to be informed in plenty of time
>> regarding any new list info. ...  This is another reason for having our
>> current moderator involved in any transition, since he would have a list
>> of
>> current members.  I have seen lists change homes, and recall a lot of
>> folks
>> being lost in the process if they have not been given ample notice, and a
>> significant window of time in which to make needed changes on their end.
>>
>> Just my thoughts.
>>
>> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of Don Risavy, Jr.
>> Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2014 8:15 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: New blind-hams list?
>>
>> Sounds good and like a plan to me and would gladly be one of the
>> moderators
>> if no one else wants.
>>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2