BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Albert Sanchez <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 30 May 2014 08:55:20 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (58 lines)
Hey Richard,
Thanks for the link to Vipre. I am trying it out on my Win XP system with 
WE8.4.
Albert, WA7FXB
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard B McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 12:56 AM
Subject: Re: OT - "VIPRE Antivirus" is Accessible and Excellent


> Hi!
>
> VIPRE Antivirus is a very accessible and excellent program.  I have used 
> it
> for years with zero trouble.  A link to its website follows:
>
> http://www.vipreantivirus.com/support/
>
> 73,
> Richard KK6MRH
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Jim Shaffer
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 8:45 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: OT question
>
> Harvey, as I understand it, the latest version is inaccessible, but prior
> versions are accessible.  I use it myself, and haven't installed the 
> latest
> version.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harvey Heagy
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 9:25 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: OT question
>
> Howard Kauffman said on this list that he felt that program was totally
> inaccessible to us.
> Harvey
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Jim Shaffer
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 9:21 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: OT question
>
> I'd try to get a version of Malwarebytes for XP and run it on that 
> machine.
>
> Perhaps there's a hard disk problem, but I'd think the results wouldn't be
> so predictable.
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2