Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 29 Mar 2014 15:26:54 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I've always done that too, John. But, for the reasons mentioned in the
discussion, I think its a better idea to mark the positive. I think it might
be worth switching.
Lou Kolb
Voice-over Artist:
Radio/TV Ads, Video narrations
Messages On-hold:
www.loukolb.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: Here's another one
>I mark the negative, I don't know why I just do honestly. I like to be
> different though.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Pearson" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 1:06 PM
> Subject: Here's another one
>
>
>>I hope to make this my last question of day. The consensus seems to be =
>> that the positive lead is the one to mark. Is there a common sense ham =
>> reason for marking this lead as opposed to the negative lead?
>>
>> 73,
>>
>>
>>
>> David S. Pearson-wa4dsp
|
|
|