BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lou Kolb <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 29 Mar 2014 15:26:54 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
I've always done that too, John. But, for the reasons mentioned in the 
discussion, I think its a better idea to mark the positive. I think it might 
be worth switching.
Lou Kolb
Voice-over Artist:
Radio/TV Ads, Video narrations
Messages On-hold:
www.loukolb.com
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: Here's another one


>I mark the negative, I don't know why I just do honestly. I like to be
> different though.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "David Pearson" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 1:06 PM
> Subject: Here's another one
>
>
>>I hope to make this my last question of day.  The consensus seems to be =
>> that the positive lead is the one to mark.  Is there a common sense ham =
>> reason for marking this lead as opposed to the negative lead?
>>
>> 73,
>>
>>
>>
>> David S. Pearson-wa4dsp 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2