BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 29 Mar 2014 15:06:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
I mark the negative, I don't know why I just do honestly. I like to be 
different though.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Pearson" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 1:06 PM
Subject: Here's another one


>I hope to make this my last question of day.  The consensus seems to be =
> that the positive lead is the one to mark.  Is there a common sense ham =
> reason for marking this lead as opposed to the negative lead?
>
> 73,
>
>
>
> David S. Pearson-wa4dsp 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2