VICUG-L Archives

Visually Impaired Computer Users' Group List

VICUG-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Pasco <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bill Pasco <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 29 Oct 2013 09:11:54 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Just my opinion, but 11 was the last completely stable JAWS version. It
runs very well on XP machines, and I don't think the newer versions gain
you that much.



-----Original Message-----
From: Visually Impaired Computer Users' Group List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Duane S. Farrar
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 6:14 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [VICUG-L] Which version of JAWS for an older PC?

Hi,

The discussion of JAWS 15 has prompted me to ask the following. I have an
older XP SP3 computer with 2 GB of RAM running JAWS 11. It has IE 8 and
Office 2003 installed on it. I have installation discs for JAWS versions
12,
13 and 14. Which version would folks recommend I upgrade to to take
advantage of newer features? Or, should I just leave it at version 11 and
be happy?

Thanks,

Duane


    VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
Archived on the World Wide Web at
    http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
    Signoff: [log in to unmask]
    Subscribe: [log in to unmask]


    VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
Archived on the World Wide Web at
    http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
    Signoff: [log in to unmask]
    Subscribe: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2