Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 31 Aug 2013 12:56:25 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Alan,
I believe that most of us agree with your point, but when you don't
have adequate test equipment or perhaps the expertise to utilize it,
on the air results indicate success or failure. My Carolina Windem
and G5RV antennaes are separated by perhaps forty-five feet and run
in essentially the same directions, but when I installed the second
wire there appeared to be no degradation in the way that the first
antenna performed and the added antenna seems to work well also. And
both wires allow me successful contacts as often as not, so
unscientifically, I declare both antennaes a success.
thanks.
Pat, K9JAUAt 12:34 PM 8/31/2013, you wrote:
>Good morning all,
>
>
>
>My point was simply that it is not possible to declare an antenna as working
>on the basis of such a limited data set. There is an awful lot more
>involved to just declare some antenna as working just because you were able
>to carry on a local QSO, probably thru a repeater at that.
>
>
>
>73
>
>
>
>
>
>Alan R. Downing
>
>Phoenix, AZ
>
>
|
|
|