BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: mfj and or r9
From:
"Mike Duke, K5XU" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mike Duke, K5XU
Date:
Wed, 28 Aug 2013 17:25:47 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
Hmmmm.

I think you mean Cushcraft.

That happened 3 or 4 years ago at least.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 2:56 PM
Subject: mfj and or r9


Hi;
I have had to much computer time I confess.  At any rate 
when did mfj
absorb witchcraft?  Anyone on this list using the r8 or r9? 
Eham would
lead one to suspect that quality deteriorated when mfj took 
over but
that may be just a few folks opinion.
-- 
richard

ATOM RSS1 RSS2