BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jim Gammon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 30 Nov 2013 10:28:25 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (98 lines)
Just some preliminary unscientific observations.  I have been 
using a Cushcraft vertical on 20 through 10 meters for a couple 
of months now.  Sorry, I don't remember the model number.  It is 
mounted on a ten foot steel post behind our garage and has its 
own ground rod, but only small radials on the antenna itself.  
The bottom of the antenna is just a couple feet above the garage 
roof.  The antenna has a match box at the feed point where the 
coax connects at the bottom.  Sorry I can't remember the model, a 
ham friend gave me this used antenna.  Anyway, my point is that 
it's my first use of a vertical on HF and is not as noisy as I 
expected it would be.  I also have a DXCC dipole that works  on 
the same bands and I can switch from one to the other antenna for 
noise and signal comparison.  I can't really tell much difference 
between the two antennas so far.  73, Jim WA6EKS

----- Original Message -----
From: John Miller <[log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]
Date sent: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 07:00:39 -0500
Subject: Re: Question about antennas

I have the 5BTV ground mounted and honestly I don't really see it 
being as
noisy as I expected hearing my whole time as a ham how noisy 
verticals are.
Height might make a difference but with being in a trailer park 
and all
buildings being the same height, I'd have to guide it like crazy 
if I went
above the roof.  I did think about it.  I have it guided now with 
very light
rope tied to the house and shed but still half of it is above the 
roof line
of all buildings in this area for miles so when we get wind, it 
sure gets
the worst of it.  I did it to be safe.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Basden" <[log in to unmask]
To: <[log in to unmask]
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 12:10 AM
Subject: Re: Question about antennas


I used the 4BTV with four radials on each band on my rooftop and 
it
 worked extremely well.  It was noisy like all verticals, but DX 
was
 readily available.

 73,

 Dave, W7OQ

 At 09:25 AM 11/29/2013, you wrote:
I have the Alpha Delta DX-EE, and it's a good dipole.  I've had 
good luck
with it for the past few years, even though I have it in my 
attic.  I
haven't used one that's exposed to the elements though, so I 
can't tell
you
how it holds up under adverse weather.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dr.  Ronald E.  Milliman
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 11:15 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Question about antennas

Is there anyone here on our list personally familiar with either 
of these
antennas, and if so, what feedback can you give me about them?

1.  The Alpha Delta DX-EE

Description: Alpha Delta "ISO-RES" inductors replace lossy traps 
and
capacitors, rated for Full Power; Direct 50 ohm feed, no antenna 
tuner is
required except for extended frequency coverage; Fully assembled 
with
insulated #12 copper wire, stainless hardware and 50 ft.  of 
nylon rope;
Includes the DELTA-C static protected center insulator and 
DELTA-CIN end
insulators; Installs horizontally OR as an inverted V; covers:
40-20-15-10M
plus 30-17-12M using a Wide Range Tuner, 40' Multi-band Antenna.


2.  Hustler 4BTV -- 4 Band Trap Vertical

Description: 4 Band Vertical HF Fixed Station covering 10,  15, 
20, and 40
Meters; 21'.

Ron, K8HSY

ATOM RSS1 RSS2