BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Butch Bussen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 19 Nov 2013 08:59:38 -0800
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (27 lines)
The other difference is the filters the 590 has, and the dsp in the 480 
is in the audio section, where in the 590 it is in the i f.
73
Butch
WA0VJR
Node 3148
Wallace, ks.


On Tue, 19 Nov 
2013, Mike Barnard wrote:

> I started out with the ts480, and now have the ts590.  No, most of
> the buttens help me navagate the radio, and with the ts590, you can
> read swr and alc  and power.  frequencies, where your agc,and other
> filters speek, and menus also speek enough even without computers
> hooked up to the radio to get it set up and running fine.
> I have really enjoyed the radios, although the ts590 talks the swr
> and has a manual notch filter and a few more bells and whistles.  But
> if I had to keep the ts480, it would be a wonderful rig.
> This is just my oppinion though.
> Mike
>
> KD2CDU.
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2