BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 29 Mar 2014 13:16:09 -0400
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Here's another one
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
From:
Steve Forst <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
I suppose the hot one is the one that will get you in trouble if  it 
gets away from you and comes into contact with a piece of gear.

I usually mark both wires and at both ends where practical.  A knot in 
the hot and a black tape flag on the  ground, but everybody  has their 
own way.

73, Steve KW3A.


On 3/29/2014 1:06 PM, David Pearson wrote:
> I hope to make this my last question of day.  The consensus seems to be =
> that the positive lead is the one to mark.  Is there a common sense ham =
> reason for marking this lead as opposed to the negative lead?
>
> 73,
>
>
>
> David S. Pearson-wa4dsp
>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2