Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:54:07 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
<052995ABC33D42CA8A384EC63A1AEDC3@johnlt> |
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I suppose for the price you could try it but personally, give me a
commercial one any day if I'm going to use one. I'll take a decent used
commercial HT any day over the ham ones and I'm sure the chinese ones are no
good in areas with a lot of intermod. Maybe I'll take my wife's to a ham
fest someday, she has a baofeng, and see how bad that is with thousands of
radios around but I know a lot of ham gear is not all that great with all
that noise and I can't see the chinese ones being any better.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: The cheap HTs
>I suspect your dealer is at least partly correct. It is a direct
> conversion receiver if I remember right. I haven't tried mine in a
> large city, don't live there any more, but I'd think in high rf fields,
> they would not be good. May depend on which radio you're talking about.
>
> 73
> Butch
> WA0VJR
> Node 3148
> Wallace, ks.
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Scott Gillen wrote:
>
>> Can anyone tell me how the cheaper Chinese handhelds work in large cities
>> wi=
>> th lots of RF around?
>>
>> A local dealer told me today that they had terrible front ends. He
>> basically=
>> said they were rubbish. I suspect it was just because he didn't sell
>> them.=20=
>>
>>
>> Scott
>> ZL1CHM / N0HOK
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone=
>>
>>
|
|
|