 
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original |
| Date: |
Tue, 24 Dec 2013 12:49:37 -0700 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Message-ID: |
<40FED5E08A5B4B90B642DBE97114B1F1@philscomputer> |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Sender: |
|
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jim,
I thought that after sending my message. I was thinking HUA, haha.
Phil.
K0NX
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Shaffer" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2013 6:24 AM
Subject: Re: Re 6-80 Zero Five Vertical
>H O A, Home Owners Association
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Scovell
> Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2013 12:11 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Re 6-80 Zero Five Vertical
>
> He must be a marine if he named it HOA.
>
> Phil.
> K0NX
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Shaffer" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 8:24 PM
> Subject: Re: Re 6-80 Zero Five Vertical
>
>
>> The reason I'm wondering about the 29 footer for 6 - 80 is that I have a
>> height restriction here. In fact, he calls it an HOA stelth antenna.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mike Ryan
>> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 5:34 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re 6-80 Zero Five Vertical
>>
>> Hi Jim:
>>
>> Although I have no experience with that antenna, when I spoke to Tom at
>> Zero Five, he recommended the 43 footer after I told him my bands of
>> operation. 80-15m, total cost of 580CAn, which included the radial plate
>> and attachment hardware.
>>
>> HTH & 73:
>> Michael DE VO1AX
>>
>
|
|
|
