I've heard that even Microsoft admits it isn't as good as it was cracked up 
to be, but I don't know why that's the case.

Steve

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 12:01
Subject: Re: off topic


> Microsoft security essentials is a lot better than you might think unless
> that's changed in the last 6 months or so.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 11:29 AM
> Subject: off topic
>
>
>> Yesterday avast updated its program and deffinitions.  Now it thinks that
>> any form of system access is so suspicious that it shuts down your
>> computer.
>> It also doesn't like text cloaner.  Consiquently, I no longer like avast.
>> The program interface has become innaccessible, even with jaws.  So
>> besides
>> micrsoft security essentials, which is very weak, does anybody have a
>> recommendation for a free anti--virus program that is both strong and
>> excessible?
>>
>> I hear for purchase, nod-32 is good.
>>
>> H T Kaufman MSW LCSW
>> Adaptive Technology Instructor
>>
>>
>> ---
>> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
>> protection is active.
>> http://www.avast.com
>