BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 16 Jul 2013 19:07:49 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (179 lines)
I was ablee to do twin receivers on my TS2000.



Sent from my iPad

On Jul 16, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Kelvin Marsh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi Steve,
> 
> Totally agree.  Not sure if you have access to the Peter Hart RadCom
> reviews, but he was very impressed with the 590 performance.  From memory, I
> think he said it performed as well as radios several times the price.  I can
> probably find the MP3 review if you want it.
> 
> In my view, the 990 is a serious option if you want twin receivers, and have
> them split into each ear.  If you don't use the split function, the money to
> an extent is being wasted.
> 
> With the discontinuation of the FT-2000, all the twin receiver radios are
> now very expensive, I believe the list is IC-7800, FTDX-5000, FT-9000, K3,
> and the TS-990.
> 
> Of the radios I've seen, I really like the IC-7600.  I'm not recommending it
> for voice announcements, as the 590 beats the accessibility hands down, but
> it feels very nice, but is twice the price of the 590  <smile>.
> 
> Best wishes, Kelvin Marsh - M0AID
> 
> Working to improve accessibility for radio amateurs with disabilities
> 
> www.active-elements.org
> 
> For accessibility evaluations of amateur equipment and MP3 manuals
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Steve Dresser
> Sent: 16 July 2013 18:26
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: TS-990 Review
> 
> One thing that stands out about the 990 is the number of physical knobs and 
> controls it has, which definitely increases the cost of the radio.  I would 
> never buy one just for its accessibility (well, maybe if I were a 
> billionaire and wanted to get rid of a little extra cash); I'd spend that 
> kind of money for other reasons such as improved filters and signal to 
> noise.  I'll be interested to see how the 590 stacks up against other radios
> 
> in that price range.
> 
> Steve
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Howard, W A 9 Y B W" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 12:32
> Subject: Re: TS-990 Review
> 
> 
>> It isn't that you need to spend $8 thousand for accessibility, it is just
>> that as Kenwood comes out with new radios, they improve the accessibility
>> from previous radios.  The TS-590 has great accessibility compared to
>> nothing.  I bet that when Kenwood comes out with their next mid-priced 
>> radio
>> to replace the 590 that radio will probably have more accessibility than 
>> the
>> 990.  Let's all praise Kenwood for what they have done to encourage them 
>> to
>> keep up the good work.  We need to contact Kenwood directly, not just in 
>> our
>> blind community.
>> 
>> I own a 570 and a 590 and while the 590 has better accessibility, the 570
>> does fine.  PRAISES to Kenwood!!
>> 
>> 73
>> 
>> Howard #3
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Michael Thurman" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 12:25 PM
>> Subject: Re: TS-990 Review
>> 
>> 
>>> can someone please explain to me why it costs 8000 bucks to get =
>>> accessibility?!?!?! I was like  I will get this radio  now  I feel like =
>>> only rich people get accessibility. I do no thane tha kind of money and =
>>> I do not see how half of you  do being blind. I certainly do not have =
>>> anywa y to get tha kind of cash being screwed by social insecurity.. =
>>> Nobody is going to hire a blind guy in this economy and those jobs tha =
>>> were out there dried up years ago for us.  and the NFB has done nothing =
>>> to help the citation. in fact i think they made it worse. no company =
>>> will risk lawsuits by hiring a blind person when there are so many =
>>> sighted applicants. Even if I could get a job, transportation costs =
>>> alone would  eat up most of what I would make.
>>> On Jul 14, 2013, at 4:38 PM, "Alan R. Downing" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hello Butch, as I mentioned to you on the land line, I have decided to =
>>> get a
>>>> 990, but I still want to wait a few more months before spending the 8 =
>>> grand.
>>>> I will also talk to Rob Sherwood and Ken Long, who are testing it in =
>>> the
>>>> lab, and writing a comprehensive review on it. Have you checked the TX =
>>> power
>>>> limit to see how close it holds to the desired power level?  The =
>>> ability to
>>>> set a hard limit on output power is especially useful for those who =
>>> run very
>>>> large amps, and don't want to exceed the 1500 watt legal limit..
>>>> =20
>>>> Best 73
>>>> =20
>>>> =20
>>>> Alan R. Downing
>>>> Phoenix, AZ
>>>> =20
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: For blind ham radio operators =
>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>>> On Behalf Of Butch Bussen
>>>> Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 12:05 PM
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: Re: TS-990 Review
>>>> =20
>>>> Yep, a very good review.  I've had my 990 for a couple months and I=20
>>>> learned some tricks I had overlooked.
>>>> 73
>>>> Butch
>>>> WA0VJR
>>>> Node 3148
>>>> Wallace, ks.
>>>> =20
>>>> =20
>>>> On Sun, 14 Jul 2013, Curtis Delzer=20
>>>> wrote:
>>>> =20
>>>>> well you've certainly done it!
>>>>> terrific review and comprehensive as well.  were you able to install
>>>>> v1.03 of the firmware while you had the radio?
>>>>> that adds a couple things significant for enthusiastic and fantastic
>>>>> operating;  AGC improvement, and seamless full break in CW without
>>>>> the clicks and thumps of earlier firmware.
>>>>> again, thanks again!
>>>>> =20
>>>>> At 02:57 AM 07/14/13, you wrote:
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>> =20
>>>>>> The accessibility review, and audio demos,  of the flagship Kenwood
>>>> TS-990
>>>>>> is at:
>>>>>> =20
>>>>>> =20
>>>> =
> http://active-elements.org/2013/07/14/kenwood-ts-990-accessibility-review-=
>>> 3/
>>>>>> =20
>>>>>> Best wishes, Kelvin Marsh - M0AID
>>>>>> =20
>>>>>> Working to improve accessibility for radio amateurs with =
>>> disabilities
>>>>>> =20
>>>>>> www.active-elements.org
>>>>>> =20
>>>>>> For accessibility evaluations of amateur equipment and MP3 manuals
>>>>> =20
>>>>> =20
> 
> 
> 
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2013.0.3349 / Virus Database: 3204/6496 - Release Date: 07/16/13

ATOM RSS1 RSS2